This page contains affiliate links. If you purchase a VPN through our links we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never influences our reviews or rankings.
I’ve been testing VPNs for over two years and have published 500+ videos on both AllThingsVPN and VPNR. In that time, two names come up constantly whenever privacy-first users are shopping around: ExpressVPN and Proton VPN.
They sit at opposite ends of a spectrum. Proton VPN is built from the ground up for privacy — Swiss jurisdiction, open-source apps, Secure Core double-routing. ExpressVPN is built for performance and ease of use — blazing Lightway protocol, polished apps, Smart DNS for streaming on every device you own.
In this ExpressVPN vs Proton VPN comparison, I ran both through my full testing process: speed tests across multiple continents, streaming checks on every major platform, security deep-dives, and a honest look at what you actually get for your money. I’ll give you a clear verdict — and tell you exactly which one to pick depending on your situation.
ExpressVPN vs Proton VPN — At a Glance
| Feature | Proton VPN | ExpressVPN |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Privacy & value | Streaming & ease of use |
| Speed retention (my tests) | ~92% | ~91% |
| Servers | 20,000+ in 145 countries | 3,000+ in 105 countries |
| VPN protocols | WireGuard, OpenVPN, IKEv2, Stealth | Lightway, OpenVPN, IKEv2 |
| No-logs policy | Audited (Securitum, 2025) | Audited (KPMG, 2025) |
| Jurisdiction | Switzerland | British Virgin Islands |
| Simultaneous devices | 10 | Up to 14 (plan-dependent) |
| Free plan | Yes (unlimited data) | No |
| Smart DNS | No | Yes (MediaStreamer) |
| Ad/malware blocker | NetShield (all paid plans) | Threat Manager (plan-dependent) |
| Secure Core / multi-hop | Yes | No |
| Port forwarding | Yes | No |
| Open-source apps | Yes | No |
| 24/7 live chat | No (email only) | Yes |
| Starting price (2-year) | $2.99/mo | $2.79/mo |
| Money-back guarantee | 30 days | 30 days |
| Affiliate link | Get Proton VPN | Get ExpressVPN |
Quick Verdicts
Best for Privacy

Proton VPN — My verdict
The strongest privacy-focused VPN I’ve tested, with Swiss jurisdiction, open-source apps, Secure Core double-routing, and a genuinely usable free tier — all at a price that undercuts ExpressVPN.
- Swiss jurisdiction outside Five Eyes — strongest legal privacy protection
- Open-source, independently audited apps — full transparency
- Secure Core servers route traffic through Switzerland, Iceland, Sweden
- ~92% speed retention in my tests — faster and more consistent than ExpressVPN
- 20,000+ servers across 145 countries — massive network
- NetShield ad/tracker/malware blocker on all paid plans
- Port forwarding — rare among premium VPNs
- Tor over VPN built in
- Free plan with unlimited data (3 locations, 1 device)
- No Smart DNS (MediaStreamer equivalent)
- No 24/7 live chat — email support only
- Free plan limits you to one device and three server locations
Best for Streaming

ExpressVPN — My verdict
A polished, beginner-friendly VPN with excellent streaming unblocking and the Lightway protocol for fast, reliable connections — though it comes at a premium and is now owned by Kape Technologies.
- Lightway protocol — fast and secure proprietary option
- MediaStreamer Smart DNS — stream on smart TVs and consoles without a VPN app
- ~91% speed retention in my tests — consistently solid
- 105 countries covered — great for international streaming
- 24/7 live chat support — fastest response I’ve tested
- Polished apps across all platforms — great for beginners
- Up to 14 simultaneous connections (Pro plan)
- Owned by Kape Technologies — worth knowing before you subscribe
- No free plan — 30-day guarantee is your only trial window
- No Secure Core / multi-hop routing
- No port forwarding
- Ad blocker only on higher-tier plans
- Server count not publicly disclosed
Speed Test Results: Proton VPN vs ExpressVPN
Speed is where these two are closer than you might expect. Both run modern protocols — Proton VPN on WireGuard, ExpressVPN on its proprietary Lightway — and both retained the vast majority of my baseline connection speed in testing.
In my tests, I measure speed retention across multiple server locations: local, a nearby country, a mid-distance location (US or Western Europe), and a long-haul server (Asia-Pacific). Here’s how they compared:
| Server Location | Proton VPN (WireGuard) | ExpressVPN (Lightway) |
|---|---|---|
| Local server | ~94% retention | ~91% retention |
| Western Europe | ~90% retention | ~88% retention |
| United States | ~86% retention | ~82% retention |
| Asia-Pacific (Tokyo/Sydney) | ~62% retention | ~55% retention |
| Average overall | ~92% | ~91% |
Proton VPN comes out slightly ahead in speed consistency, especially on distant servers. The difference on a local server is marginal, but it compounds noticeably when you’re connecting across continents. Proton’s VPN Accelerator technology — which optimizes packet handling — makes a real difference on long-haul connections.
ExpressVPN’s Lightway protocol is genuinely impressive and delivers very stable connections. For most users in Europe or North America connecting to nearby servers, both will feel identically fast in day-to-day use. The gap only becomes obvious at distance.
Speed winner: Proton VPN — marginally faster and more consistent across global servers, especially at distance.
Security & Privacy: Who Protects You Better?
Both services use AES-256 encryption (plus ChaCha20 as an alternative), support a kill switch, and have independently audited no-logs policies. The fundamentals are covered on both sides. But when you dig deeper, Proton VPN has a meaningful advantage for privacy-critical use cases.
| Security Feature | Proton VPN | ExpressVPN |
|---|---|---|
| Encryption | AES-256 + ChaCha20 | AES-256 + ChaCha20 |
| Jurisdiction | Switzerland (outside 5/9/14 Eyes) | British Virgin Islands (outside 5/9/14 Eyes) |
| No-logs audit | Securitum (2025) | KPMG (2025) |
| Open-source apps | Yes — full GitHub access | No |
| Secure Core (multi-hop) | Yes — Switzerland, Iceland, Sweden | No |
| Stealth / obfuscation protocol | Yes (Stealth protocol) | Yes (built into all servers) |
| Tor over VPN | Yes — dedicated Onion servers | No |
| RAM-only servers | No (questions their added value) | Yes (TrustedServer) |
| Forward Secrecy | Yes | Yes |
| Kill switch | Yes (all platforms) | Yes (all platforms) |
| DNS leak protection | Yes | Yes |
| Port forwarding | Yes | No |
| Corporate ownership | Proton AG (independent) | Kape Technologies |
Proton VPN’s key privacy advantages are hard to argue with. Switzerland has some of the world’s most protective privacy laws, and the Swiss court system has already tested Proton’s no-logs claims — and they held up. The open-source apps mean anyone can audit the code. And Secure Core is a genuinely unique feature: it routes your traffic through Proton-owned hardware in privacy-friendly countries before it exits to the open internet, making traffic correlation attacks dramatically harder.
ExpressVPN counters with RAM-only TrustedServer infrastructure and its own audited no-logs policy — but Proton VPN has actually pushed back on the idea that RAM-only servers are meaningfully more secure than standard servers when a rigorous no-logs policy is already in place. The BVI is also a solid privacy jurisdiction, but Swiss law is, in practice, harder to compel.
For journalists, activists, or anyone facing genuine surveillance threats, Proton VPN is the clear choice. For the average user who just wants solid baseline privacy, both are trustworthy.
Security & privacy winner: Proton VPN — Swiss jurisdiction, open-source apps, Secure Core, and Tor over VPN give it a meaningful edge.
Streaming: Netflix, BBC iPlayer, Disney+, and More
Both Proton VPN and ExpressVPN reliably unblock all major streaming platforms in my testing. Netflix US, Netflix UK, BBC iPlayer, Disney+, Hulu, Amazon Prime Video, HBO Max — all accessible with both services.
| Streaming Platform | Proton VPN | ExpressVPN |
|---|---|---|
| Netflix US | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Netflix UK / other libraries | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| BBC iPlayer | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Disney+ | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Hulu | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Amazon Prime Video | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| HBO Max | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| YouTube TV | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Smart DNS (non-VPN devices) | ❌ No | ✅ Yes (MediaStreamer) |
The differentiator for streaming is ExpressVPN’s MediaStreamer Smart DNS. This allows you to unblock geo-restricted content on devices that can’t run a VPN app — smart TVs, gaming consoles, older streaming sticks, and similar hardware. Proton VPN simply doesn’t have an equivalent feature.
If you’re purely streaming from a phone, laptop, or tablet, Proton VPN is just as capable. But if you want to watch geo-blocked content on an Apple TV, PS5, or a smart TV without router-level setup, ExpressVPN has a genuine advantage.
Streaming winner: ExpressVPN — equivalent performance on standard devices, but MediaStreamer gives it broader device reach.
Torrenting & P2P
Both services allow P2P traffic, but Proton VPN is meaningfully better for dedicated torrenters.
Proton VPN for Torrenting
- Dedicated P2P-optimized servers
- Port forwarding built in — improves download speeds and peer connectivity
- 20,000+ servers give you more location options
- No bandwidth throttling on P2P
ExpressVPN for Torrenting
- P2P allowed on all servers — no special configuration needed
- No dedicated P2P servers
- No port forwarding support
- Split tunneling available on Windows, Mac, Android
Port forwarding is the deciding factor here. Very few premium VPNs offer it, and Proton VPN’s implementation is particularly clean — it routes through Proton’s own firewall, so you get the connectivity benefits without opening security holes. In practical download tests, both providers delivered comparable speeds on the same file, but Proton VPN’s dedicated P2P servers and port forwarding make it the stronger long-term choice for heavy torrenters.
Torrenting winner: Proton VPN — port forwarding and dedicated P2P servers are a meaningful advantage.
Pricing Comparison
| Plan | Proton VPN | ExpressVPN |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes — unlimited data, 3 locations, 1 device | No |
| Monthly plan | $9.99/mo | $12.99/mo |
| 1-year plan | $3.99/mo | $4.99/mo (Basic) |
| 2-year plan (best value) | $2.99/mo | $2.79/mo (Basic) |
| Current deal | 70% OFF | 78% OFF + 4 months free |
| Money-back guarantee | 30 days | 30 days |
| Payment options | Card, PayPal, Bitcoin, cash | Card, PayPal, Bitcoin, Paymentwall |
At the 2-year level, ExpressVPN’s Basic plan ($2.79/mo) comes in fractionally cheaper than Proton VPN’s Plus plan ($2.99/mo) — but the comparison is misleading. ExpressVPN’s Basic plan doesn’t include the ad blocker or tracker blocking; those are Advanced and Pro tier features. Proton VPN’s Plus plan includes NetShield (ad/tracker/malware blocker), Secure Core, port forwarding, and Tor over VPN.
To get a broadly equivalent feature set from ExpressVPN, you’re looking at the Advanced plan ($3.59/mo on 2-year) — which makes Proton VPN the better-value option at equivalent feature levels.
The free plan is also a genuine differentiator. Proton VPN’s free tier has no ads, no data cap, and a real no-logs policy. It’s the most trustworthy free VPN I’ve used. ExpressVPN has no equivalent.
Proton VPN also accepts cash payments — one of the very few VPN providers that do, and a meaningful option for users who want complete anonymity in their subscription.
Pricing winner: Proton VPN — better value at equivalent feature levels, plus a genuinely useful free plan.
Server Network
| Proton VPN | ExpressVPN | |
|---|---|---|
| Server count | 20,000+ | 3,000+ (undisclosed exact number) |
| Countries | 145 | 105 |
| Virtual servers | Some | Some |
| Specialty servers | Secure Core, P2P, Tor | P2P (all servers) |
| RAM-only servers | No | Yes (TrustedServer) |
Proton VPN’s network is significantly larger — 20,000+ servers versus ExpressVPN’s undisclosed (but significantly smaller) count. ExpressVPN’s refusal to publish its exact server count is worth noting; Proton VPN is transparent about its infrastructure. More servers generally means less congestion, more location options, and more resilience.
ExpressVPN’s 105-country coverage is still excellent and covers virtually every market you’d realistically need. But Proton VPN’s 145-country reach means more options, particularly in Africa, Central Asia, and Eastern Europe.
Server network winner: Proton VPN — larger network, more countries, more transparent infrastructure.
Features Comparison
| Feature | Proton VPN | ExpressVPN |
|---|---|---|
| Smart DNS | ❌ No | ✅ MediaStreamer |
| Ad & malware blocker | ✅ NetShield (all paid plans) | ✅ Threat Manager (Advanced/Pro only) |
| Split tunneling | ✅ Windows, Android, Android TV, browser ext. | ✅ Windows, Mac, Android, router |
| Secure Core / multi-hop | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
| Tor over VPN | ✅ Dedicated Onion servers | ❌ No |
| Port forwarding | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
| Obfuscation / Stealth | ✅ Stealth protocol (Windows, Mac, iOS, Android) | ✅ Built into all servers |
| VPN Accelerator | ✅ Yes — up to 400% speed improvement | ❌ No |
| Password manager | ❌ No (Proton Pass sold separately) | ✅ ExpressVPN Keys (Advanced/Pro) |
| Open-source apps | ✅ Yes (GitHub) | ❌ No |
Proton VPN’s feature set is deeper for security and privacy: Secure Core, Tor over VPN, port forwarding, and the VPN Accelerator are all things ExpressVPN simply doesn’t offer. NetShield is also included on all paid plans, while ExpressVPN’s equivalent (Threat Manager) is gated behind higher tiers.
ExpressVPN’s edge is in streaming convenience (MediaStreamer) and the integrated password manager on its mid and top-tier plans. The router-level split tunneling is also a nice option for managing whole-home traffic.
Features winner: Proton VPN — deeper security and privacy feature set at a lower price point.
Censorship & Restricted Countries (China, UAE, etc.)
Both services can work in heavily restricted countries, but they take different approaches.
Proton VPN’s Stealth protocol disguises VPN traffic as regular HTTPS traffic, making it harder for Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) systems to detect. It also offers Tor over VPN as a fallback — if Stealth gets blocked, you have a second option. This double-layer approach is genuinely valuable in countries with aggressive VPN blocking.
ExpressVPN uses obfuscation built into its Lightway protocol — it’s always on rather than a separate toggle, which means every server has some degree of obfuscation. This is convenient, but you don’t get the Tor over VPN fallback option.
Censorship resistance winner: Proton VPN — two independent bypass tools (Stealth + Tor) versus one is the safer option in restrictive environments.
Apps & Device Compatibility
| Platform | Proton VPN | ExpressVPN |
|---|---|---|
| Windows | ✅ Full-featured | ✅ Full-featured |
| macOS | ✅ Full-featured | ✅ Full-featured |
| Linux | ✅ GUI app | ✅ GUI app |
| Android | ✅ Full-featured | ✅ Full-featured |
| iOS | ✅ (no split tunneling) | ✅ (no kill switch or split tunneling) |
| Android TV | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Fire TV / Fire Stick | ✅ Yes | ✅ Yes |
| Browser extensions | Chrome, Firefox | Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Brave, Vivaldi |
| Router support | Manual setup | Manual + Aircove dedicated router |
| Simultaneous connections | 10 (all plans) | Up to 14 (Pro plan) / 8–12 lower tiers |
ExpressVPN has a broader browser extension selection and the dedicated Aircove router, which makes whole-home VPN protection very easy to set up. On simultaneous connections, Proton VPN’s 10-device limit on all paid plans is actually better than most ExpressVPN plans — only the Pro tier matches or exceeds it.
Both apps are polished and well-designed. ExpressVPN is slightly simpler and more beginner-friendly; Proton VPN exposes more options, which some users will appreciate and others will find overwhelming.
Compatibility winner: Tie — ExpressVPN wins on browser extensions and router support, Proton VPN wins on device limits and Linux experience.
Customer Support
This is the clearest win for ExpressVPN. It offers 24/7 live chat, available to anyone regardless of whether they have an account. In my tests, response times were under two minutes, and the quality of support was solid.
Proton VPN offers email-based support with response times ranging from a few hours to a full day depending on queue volume. Paid subscribers can access live chat, but it’s not available 24/7. The knowledge base is comprehensive, and the community subreddit is active — but if you’re the kind of user who wants immediate help when something goes wrong, ExpressVPN has a real advantage.
Support winner: ExpressVPN — 24/7 live chat is genuinely useful and hard to compete with.
Head-to-Head Summary
| Category | Winner |
|---|---|
| Speed | 🟢 Proton VPN |
| Security & Privacy | 🟢 Proton VPN |
| Streaming | 🔵 ExpressVPN |
| Torrenting | 🟢 Proton VPN |
| Pricing & Value | 🟢 Proton VPN |
| Server Network | 🟢 Proton VPN |
| Features | 🟢 Proton VPN |
| Censorship Resistance | 🟢 Proton VPN |
| Device Compatibility | 🤝 Tie |
| Customer Support | 🔵 ExpressVPN |
| Overall Winner | 🟢 Proton VPN (7-2-1) |
Who Should Choose Proton VPN?
Who Should Choose ExpressVPN?
What About Surfshark?
I want to be transparent with you: while Proton VPN wins this head-to-head, neither of these is my overall #1 recommendation. That title goes to Surfshark, and here’s why it matters in this context:
Surfshark hits ~95% speed retention in my tests — faster than both ExpressVPN and Proton VPN. The Surfshark One plan bundles antivirus, data breach monitoring, a search tool, and a VPN at $1.99/mo on the 2-year plan — significantly cheaper than either of the two services in this comparison at comparable feature levels. You also get unlimited simultaneous devices, which neither ExpressVPN nor Proton VPN offers.
For a full breakdown, read my Surfshark review or the Surfshark vs NordVPN comparison.
Final Verdict: Proton VPN vs ExpressVPN
Proton VPN is the better VPN in this head-to-head. It’s faster in my tests, covers more countries, offers more advanced security features, and delivers better value at equivalent feature levels. If you care about privacy — genuinely care, not just in theory — Swiss jurisdiction, open-source apps, and Secure Core are things that matter, and Proton VPN has all three.
ExpressVPN is not a bad choice. It’s polished, reliable, and excellent for streaming across a wider range of devices thanks to MediaStreamer. If 24/7 live chat support and the simplest possible setup experience are your priorities, it earns its place. Just know that you’re paying a premium for convenience, and Kape Technologies’ ownership is something to factor into your trust calculation.
For most users, though, Proton VPN wins this comparison — and for the best all-around value on the market, Surfshark remains my top overall pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Proton VPN faster than ExpressVPN?
In my testing, yes — Proton VPN using WireGuard consistently delivered slightly higher speed retention than ExpressVPN’s Lightway protocol, particularly on distant servers. Both are genuinely fast VPNs and the difference in day-to-day use for nearby servers is minimal, but Proton VPN edges ahead overall with an average of around 92% speed retention versus ExpressVPN’s 91%. For raw speed, Surfshark (~95% retention) is the fastest I’ve tested.
Is ExpressVPN still trustworthy in 2026?
It depends on your threat model. ExpressVPN has an independently audited no-logs policy (KPMG, 2025) and there’s no credible evidence it logs user data. However, it is owned by Kape Technologies, a company with a complicated history (previously known as Crossrider, linked to adware). For most everyday users this is unlikely to matter. For journalists, activists, or anyone in a high-risk environment, Proton VPN’s fully independent ownership under Swiss law is a more conservative and trustworthy choice.
Does Proton VPN have a free version?
Yes. Proton VPN’s free tier is the most trustworthy free VPN I’ve used — it has no ads, no data cap, and a real independently audited no-logs policy. The limitations are real: you’re limited to one device and access to servers in three locations (US, Netherlands, Japan). P2P and Secure Core are not available on the free plan. For basic privacy while browsing, it’s excellent. Upgrade to the Plus plan to unlock all features and the full server network.
Which is better for streaming: Proton VPN or ExpressVPN?
Both reliably unblock Netflix US, BBC iPlayer, Disney+, Hulu, and Amazon Prime Video. The differentiator is ExpressVPN’s MediaStreamer Smart DNS, which allows you to access geo-restricted content on devices that can’t run a VPN app — smart TVs, gaming consoles, and similar hardware. If you’re streaming from a phone, laptop, or tablet, either service works equally well. If you want to unblock content on a PlayStation or Apple TV without router configuration, ExpressVPN has the edge.
Which VPN is better for torrenting?
Proton VPN. It offers dedicated P2P servers and, crucially, port forwarding — a feature very few premium VPNs include. Port forwarding improves download speeds and helps you connect to more peers, which matters for less-seeded torrents. ExpressVPN allows P2P on all servers but doesn’t offer port forwarding or dedicated P2P infrastructure. For casual torrenters the difference is small; for heavy P2P users, Proton VPN is the clear pick.
Does ExpressVPN work in China?
ExpressVPN does work in China for many users, using obfuscation built into its Lightway protocol. However, Proton VPN offers two independent censorship bypass tools — its Stealth protocol and Tor over VPN — which means you have a fallback option if one gets blocked. For the highest reliability in heavily restricted environments like China, UAE, or Iran, Proton VPN’s dual-layer approach is the safer bet.
Is Proton VPN worth the price?
Yes. At $2.99/mo on the 2-year plan, Proton VPN Plus delivers a feature set that includes NetShield, Secure Core, port forwarding, Tor over VPN, and 10 simultaneous device connections. That’s more than you get from most VPNs at a higher price. To get an equivalent feature set from ExpressVPN, you’d need the Advanced plan at $3.59/mo. Proton VPN also offers a free tier, which lets you test the service before committing to a subscription.
What is Secure Core and why does it matter?
Secure Core is Proton VPN’s multi-hop server feature. When enabled, your traffic is routed through Proton-owned servers in privacy-friendly countries (Switzerland, Iceland, Sweden) before exiting through a standard endpoint server. This adds a layer of protection against network-based attacks — even if an adversary can monitor the exit server, they can’t trace the connection back to you because the entry server is in a jurisdiction with very strong legal privacy protections. It’s particularly valuable for journalists, activists, and users in high-risk environments. ExpressVPN has no equivalent feature.
How many devices can I use with Proton VPN vs ExpressVPN?
Proton VPN allows 10 simultaneous connections on all paid plans. ExpressVPN’s device limits vary by plan: the Basic plan allows 8, Advanced allows 12, and Pro allows 14. If you’re on ExpressVPN’s entry-level plan and Proton VPN’s standard plan, Proton VPN actually allows more simultaneous connections. Neither service matches Surfshark, which allows unlimited simultaneous connections on all plans.
Who owns ExpressVPN?
ExpressVPN is owned by Kape Technologies, a company based in the UK that also owns CyberGhost and Private Internet Access (PIA). Kape Technologies was previously known as Crossrider, a company that was linked to adware distribution — though Crossrider rebranded and pivoted to cybersecurity. ExpressVPN has passed independent no-logs audits and there’s no evidence of user data being logged or misused, but Kape’s ownership history is something I think users should know about when making their decision. Proton VPN is owned by Proton AG, the team behind Proton Mail, and operates as an independent privacy-focused company.
70% OFF

Proton VPN Plus — 2-Year Plan
The best privacy VPN on the market, with Secure Core, NetShield, port forwarding, Tor over VPN, and 10 simultaneous connections — all for less than $3/month.
Open-Source Apps
Secure Core
NetShield Blocker
Tor over VPN
Port Forwarding
Read next:
















